Optimizing physical fitness in chronic stroke patients: the impact of exercise training modality and dosage on maximal and sub-maximal fitness - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Felix Nindorera, Clement Leveque, Eric Meyer and 2 others
PMID 40787723WHAT IT FOUND
Aerobic exercise improved fitness and walking distance in people more than six months after stroke; mixed training also improved peak fitness.
Trials of 45-minute sessions, three times a week for at least eight weeks, showed the largest gains.
Key findings
01Across 23 trials in 1,061 people past six months after stroke, exercise training improved peak fitness, with both aerobic and mixed training showing benefit on their own.
02Walking distance on the six-minute walk test improved by a mean of 34.30 metres across 26 trials in 1,444 people, but only aerobic training was significant within the subgroup analysis.
03Total training time was not significantly related to effect size, but trials using at least 45 minutes, three times a week, for at least eight weeks showed the largest improvements in both walking distance and peak fitness.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only immediate post-intervention results were used; the review excluded follow-up data, so it says nothing about whether gains last. The 45-minute, three-times-a-week, eight-week dose is descriptive. The analysis that actually tested total training time against effect size found no significant relationship. Training protocols applied the frequency, intensity, time and type principles inconsistently, and some pooled analyses were highly heterogeneous. 91% of the included trials were rated high risk of bias for blinding of participants and personnel, which is hard to avoid in exercise trials but still weakens them. Two of the 38 trials could not be pooled because means or standard deviations were missing. Resistance training was represented by only four trials and mixed training by five, so those subgroup results rest on very few studies. Participants averaged between 44 and 75 years old and most trials were run in developed countries, which limits how far the findings travel. Selection criteria and missing data may have left out contextual factors such as participant motivation.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study received no specific funding; open-access fees were covered by the institution.
The easy way to misread this
Do not treat 45 minutes, three times a week for eight weeks as a proven dose. The paper's own test of total training time found no significant link to effect size, so this describes which trials happened to do best, not a threshold that causes improvement.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →