SLPCohortEar and hearing2018

Optimizing Clinical Interpretation of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants.

Chelsea M Blankenship, Lisa L Hunter, Douglas H Keefe and 5 others

PMID 29517520

WHAT IT FOUND

Infant DPOAE results should be read against infant-specific cut-offs, not adult norms.

Passing both emission level and signal-to-noise ratio at 3 of 5 or 3 of 4 frequencies best indicates normal cochlear function.

Key findings

01When infant DPOAE levels were judged against Gorga et al. (1997) norms, many hearing-loss ears fell in the normal range, including 65% at 4 kHz and 43% at 8 kHz.

02Requiring both DPOAE level and signal-to-noise ratio to pass at 3 of 5 test frequencies gave 100% sensitivity and 82% specificity for ears with sensorineural or mixed hearing loss.

03After DPOAEs suggest hearing loss, ambient absorbance may help identify ears with a conductive component, because normal-hearing ears had higher absorbance than ears with conductive or mixed loss.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Most included ears had normal hearing, and only 85 ears had hearing loss, so the hearing-loss classification results depend on a small loss sample. Most hearing-loss ears had conductive loss, with 67 conductive, 10 sensorineural, and 8 mixed ears, so the findings for sensorineural or mixed loss rest on small numbers. The study could not evaluate test performance for normal hearing versus pure sensorineural loss because only 10 ears had pure sensorineural loss. Of 975 enrolled ears, 456 were analyzed; exclusions included 18 ears without DPOAE data, 17 without ABR data, 2 with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, 5 tested outside the first visit age range, 473 not meeting normal hearing criteria, and 4 hearing-impaired ears missing later test data. Hearing status was assigned from an overall clinical diagnosis that combined first-visit tests and later confirmation, and some auditory brainstem response and behavioral hearing test thresholds did not agree. In about 80% of cases with conductive loss diagnosed by auditory brainstem response, hearing was normal on later behavioral testing, so conductive status at one visit may not reflect stable hearing. Absorbance was tested only at ambient pressure, not at tympanometric peak pressure. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were not always measured at all frequencies because testing depended on infant state and time. Later diagnostic accuracy analyses were not done because too few ears had hearing loss at 9 to 12 months.

Declared interests

The supplied text lists research support from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and NIH extramural funding. It does not provide a commercial conflict of interest statement or author disclosure list.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the 100% sensitivity for sensorineural or mixed loss as proof that DPOAEs detect all infant hearing loss. That result excluded pure conductive ears, and the sensorineural or mixed group contained 10 ears with sensorineural loss and 8 ears with mixed loss.

Read it on PubMed →