SLPSurveyDisability and rehabilitation2025

Older adults with communication disabilities and their use of communication support at doctor's visits: a nationally representative study.

Jennifer Y Oshita, Nancy M Gell, Nicholas S Reed and 2 others

PMID 38826064

WHAT IT FOUND

Older adults with communication disabilities used a communication support person at doctor visits more often than peers without disabilities (40.1% vs 16.8%), but over half did not.

Black older adults and women with communication disabilities were less likely to use it.

Key findings

01Older adults with any communication disability used a communication support person more often than those without (40.1% vs 16.8%). After adjustment for age, sociodemographic, health and disability factors, the adjusted prevalence ratio was 1.41.

02Older adults with co-occurring communication disabilities used communication support more often (64.3%) than those with hearing-only (34.7%), expressive-only (35.4%), or cognitive-only (35.9%) disabilities.

03Among older adults with communication disabilities, Black adults and women were less likely to use communication support than White adults and men (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.80 for Black vs White and 0.76 for women vs men).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study is cross-sectional, so it cannot show that communication disabilities caused greater use of support persons. It used survey responses and could not measure the severity of each communication disability or the patient's communication preferences. It did not assess possible negative impacts of using a support person. It excluded people living in nursing facilities and people with prior dementia, so it does not describe those groups. It excluded people reporting communication difficulty due to English as a second language, so it does not address limited English proficiency. Communication support was counted only when someone accompanied and helped with specific communication tasks, so it may miss other forms of help or provider accommodations.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that bringing a support person solves the communication barrier. The study only counted whether someone helped with communication at a visit; it did not measure whether this support improved care or whether clinical accommodations were provided.

Read it on PubMed →