OTOtherOTJR : occupation, participation and health2025

Occupational Therapy Research Publications From 2001 to 2020 in PubMed: Trends and Comparative Analysis with Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation.

Heather A Shepherd, Tiago S Jesus, Emily Nalder and 2 others

PMID 39503339

WHAT IT FOUND

Occupational therapy research publications grew from 39 in 2001 to 144 in 2020, but still make up under 2.5% of rehabilitation research and fell relative to physiotherapy, from 7% to about 4%.

Reviews are now the single largest category.

Key findings

01Occupational therapy research publications indexed in PubMed rose from 39 in 2001 to 144 in 2020, a 269% increase, or about 5.86 more publications each year.

02Occupational therapy publications stayed below 2.5% of rehabilitation research publications with no significant change over the 20 years, and fell against physiotherapy from 7% to about 4%.

03In 2020 knowledge syntheses were the most common occupational therapy study design at 45.14%, up from 7.69% in 2001, while evaluation studies fell to 10.42% from 61.54%.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only publications indexed in PubMed were counted. Several occupational therapy journals are not indexed there, and occupational therapy research published in education, social justice or other non-health journals falls outside PubMed's scope, so the occupational therapy totals are probably an undercount. The funding comparison stops at 2015 because a change in PubMed's indexing created an artificial drop in funded publications after that point. Only 'major' subject terms were used, so research that was about occupational therapy but not indexed as occupational therapy focused was excluded. The study counted publications and did not assess the quality of any of them. Indexation delays meant more recent years could not be included fairly, and the earliest years with residual numbers were dropped from the original 20-year window.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest and received no financial support for the research, authorship or publication of the article.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the small occupational therapy share as proof that little occupational therapy research exists. The authors' own limitation is that several occupational therapy journals and occupational therapy adjacent journals are not indexed in PubMed, so this counts only what PubMed holds. It also says nothing about the quality of any publication counted.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →