Occupational Dysfunction as a Mediator between Recovery Process and Difficulties in Daily Life in Severe and Persistent Mental Illness: A Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling Approach.
Aki Watanabe, Takayuki Kawaguchi, Mai Sakimoto and 3 others
PMID 35832099WHAT IT FOUND
In people with severe mental illness, greater daily-life difficulties were associated with lower recovery.
Occupational dysfunction was associated with greater daily-life difficulties and lower recovery.
Key findings
01In the model, greater difficulties in daily life were directly associated with lower recovery.
02In the model, greater difficulties in daily life were associated with more occupational dysfunction, and more occupational dysfunction was associated with lower recovery.
03In the model, occupational dysfunction carried an indirect effect from daily-life difficulties to lower recovery.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a cross-sectional survey, not a trial, so it cannot show that changing occupational dysfunction or daily-life difficulties will change recovery. The 98 participants were people already using Japanese community mental health services and who volunteered, so findings may not apply to people not using services, people with more severe current instability, or other health systems. The study did not include people just starting services or potential service users who still lived in the community. Scores were biased toward higher recovery and lower daily-life difficulties and occupational dysfunction, possibly because long-term service use masked some problems. The study relied on self-reported measures, and the Recovery Assessment Scale has been debated as a measure of personal recovery. Income, regional characteristics, symptom severity and medication amount were not included, so the model may miss important context.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that reducing occupational dysfunction will improve recovery. The study was cross-sectional and only showed that these variables were associated in a statistical model.