RNSystematic ReviewInternational journal of nursing sciences2025

Nursing management of the neurogenic bladder: Evidence map of quality and recommendations from clinical practice guidelines.

Yuanyuan Li, Jinhui Tian, Luying Cheng and 7 others

PMID 40786858

WHAT IT FOUND

Most neurogenic bladder care guidelines were medium quality, and four core nursing recommendations contradicted each other, including manual-assisted voiding and catheter choices.

Check local policy and evidence grades before using them.

Key findings

01Only two of the 19 neurogenic bladder guidelines were rated high quality by AGREE II, and only one was rated high quality by AGREE-REX.

02Forty core nursing recommendations were extracted, and four of them were contradictory.

03Seven guidelines preferred sterile intermittent catheterization to reduce urinary tract infections, while the ICI remained inconclusive because evidence was insufficient to compare catheterization methods.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only Chinese and English guidelines were included, so useful guidelines in other languages may have been missed. The quality ratings used subjective tools; even with good agreement among raters, AGREE II and AGREE-REX scores can still introduce evaluation bias. The review appraised guidelines rather than patients, so it does not provide direct evidence of treatment effects. Many included guidelines had low scores in applicability, rigor of development, editorial independence, and values and preferences, so they may not be ready-made bedside protocols.

Declared interests

This research received no specific grant from public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies. The authors declared no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as evidence that any bladder technique improves patient outcomes. The paper appraised guideline quality and consistency, not treatment results, so it cannot show whether intermittent catheterization, manual voiding, or education works.

Read it on PubMed →