Nonverbal Visual Sequential Learning in Children With Cochlear Implants: Preliminary Findings.
Kelsey E Klein, Elizabeth A Walker, J Bruce Tomblin
PMID 29547477WHAT IT FOUND
Children with cochlear implants learned the hidden visual pattern as well as children with normal hearing.
They were slower to respond overall, which may reflect processing speed rather than a learning deficit.
Key findings
01During the phase with a hidden repeating pattern, children responded faster over time, and the improvement was similar for children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing.
02After the hidden-pattern phase, children were slower on random trials, showing they had learned the pattern; this learning effect did not differ between groups.
03Children with cochlear implants were slower than normal-hearing children on random trials, but age at implantation was not related to learning rate.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Twenty children with cochlear implants is a small sample, so the findings are preliminary. The normal-hearing group did not have complete cognitive-linguistic data, so the groups may not have been fully comparable. The cochlear implant group had no grammar-ability data, and grammar ability may affect sequential learning. The cochlear implant group was generally strong in visuospatial processing: 8 of 14 children with available scores were at least one standard deviation above the normative mean. The sample was described as cognitively within normal limits, so results may not apply to children with cochlear implants who have cognitive or language delays. Only one implicit learning measure was used, the serial reaction time task, and the sequence was a 10-item repeating pattern. Age at implantation had a restricted range, so the study could not detect effects in children implanted later. The cochlear implant group included 6 children with bilateral implants, and the study could not separate the effect of bilateral implantation. The study did not test more challenging sequences, so group differences might emerge with harder tasks.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that children with cochlear implants have no cognitive or language differences. The study tested only one nonverbal visual learning task in a small group, and children with cochlear implants were slower to respond during random blocks, which may reflect processing speed rather than learning.