SLPOtherMolecular autism2022

Nonshared environmental factors in the aetiology of autism and other neurodevelopmental conditions: a monozygotic co-twin control study.

Johan Isaksson, Vladislav Ruchkin, Nikolas Aho and 3 others

PMID 35183250

WHAT IT FOUND

Among identical twin pairs, the twin with at least 18% lower birth weight had more autistic and ADHD traits than their co-twin.

Higher cumulative early medical risk was also linked to more autistic traits. This shows a link, not a cause.

Key findings

01In pairs with birth weight discordance of 18% or more, the lower-weight twin had higher autistic trait scores and higher ADHD traits than their co-twin.

02The twin who received medication during infancy had higher autistic traits than their co-twin, and the association remained after correcting for multiple comparisons.

03A higher cumulative perinatal risk load was associated with more autistic traits and more neurodevelopmental diagnoses, and these associations remained after correction.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Exposure information was collected retrospectively from parents and medical records, so recall or confirmation bias is possible. Birthweight agreement with medical records was excellent, but agreement was lower for some other risk factors, such as breech position and cumulative early medical events. Prenatal factors were not analysed because identical twins share the prenatal environment, so maternal medication and teratogen exposure could not be studied. The design was observational, so it cannot prove that any risk factor caused autism, ADHD, intellectual disability or lower IQ. Reverse causality could not be excluded, because the condition or related factors may have increased the chance of reporting some early medical events. The sample was selected to include many twins discordant for neurodevelopmental conditions, so it is not a representative population sample. Some specific exposures had very few discordant twin pairs, making those analyses underpowered. Some exposures were indirect indicators of medical problems, such as oxygen therapy for hypoxia or phototherapy for jaundice. Many comparisons were made, and some associations that were significant at P < 0.05 did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons.

Declared interests

The work was funded by Vetenskapsrådet, VINNOVA, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Hjärnfonden, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd, Stockholm Brain Institute, Autism and Asperger Association Stockholm, Queen Silvia Jubilee Fund, Stiftelsen Solstickan, PRIMA Child and Adult Psychiatry, the Pediatric Research Foundation at Astrid Lindgren Children’s Hospital, Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning, Stiftelsen Sven Jerrings Fond, Svenska Frimurarorden, Stiftelsen Kempe-Carlgrenska Fonden, Stiftelsen Sunnerdahls Handikappfond, Jeanssons Stiftelser, EU-AIMS, the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking, the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme, and Karolinska Institute. The supplied text lists funders but does not state author competing interests.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these twin-pair associations as proof that birth weight discordance, infant medication, or early illness caused autism, ADHD, or lower IQ. The study was observational, prenatal factors could not be analysed, reverse causality could not be excluded, and many specific exposures had too few discordant pairs for firm conclusions.

Read it on PubMed →