Negative Beliefs About Working with Health Problems and Support at Work as Predictors for Return to Work for People Struggling with Common Mental Disorders.
Marianne Tranberg Bjørndal, Kristian Pihl Frederiksen, Ragne Gunnarsdatter Hole Gjengedal and 4 others
PMID 39453545WHAT IT FOUND
In people receiving treatment for common mental disorders, negative beliefs about working with health problems predicted lower likelihood of being at work at treatment end.
Perceived support at work predicted being at work when examined alone, but not uniquely.
Key findings
01Two work-related factors were identified: support at work and negative beliefs about working with health problems.
02In separate analyses, both factors significantly predicted full return to work at the end of treatment.
03When both factors were entered together, only negative beliefs about working with health problems remained a significant predictor.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was an observational study, so it can show associations but not prove that beliefs or workplace support caused return to work. Patients received individualised cognitive behavioural therapy or metacognitive therapy plus work interventions, so the study did not test one specific treatment. The prediction analysis used 387 of 797 participants with complete data, and those with complete data had higher education than those without. The sample came from one outpatient clinic, was mostly women, and had high education, so it may not apply to other mental health settings or diagnoses. Severe mental disorders, high suicide risk, and substance abuse were excluded, so findings do not apply to those groups. Time pressure and autonomy statements did not form usable factors, so their predictive value was not tested. Return to work was measured only at the end of treatment, not at longer follow-up. The factor structure needs replication in other samples.
Declared interests
Funding came from the Southern and Eastern Norwegian Regional Health Authority and Diakonhjemmet Hospital. The supplied text does not report author conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that improving workplace support or changing negative beliefs will cause more return to work. This was an observational study, and the treatment was not randomised, so the associations may reflect other factors.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →