SLPRNQualitativeJournal of advanced nursing2025

Need for Human Interaction and Acknowledging Communication-An Interview Study With Patients With Aphasia Following Stroke.

Mia Ingerslev Loft, Lone Lundbak Mathiesen, Frederik Gybel Jensen

PMID 39400416

WHAT IT FOUND

Stroke patients with aphasia described nurse communication as almost exclusively task-focused.

They valued staff who gave time, spoke quietly, avoided guessing, explained care, and treated them as equal human beings.

Key findings

01Patients described communication with nursing staff as almost exclusively task- or purpose-oriented.

02Patients valued being acknowledged as equal human beings: staff who listened, respected competence, and behaved normally while considering difficulties were seen positively.

03Misunderstandings sometimes affected care, including not knowing which medicine was given or receiving medication the patient had not agreed to.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was done in one inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit in Denmark, so the findings may not fit other settings or patients outside late admission. Participants were selected by speech and language therapists and had to be stable and willing, so patients who were more acute, distressed, or unwilling are not represented. Interviews with aphasia rely heavily on non-verbal communication, and transcription was partial, so interpretation by the researchers may have shaped what was reported. The study describes patient experiences and themes. It does not test whether communication strategies improve care.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was funded by Novo Nordisk Fonden.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that communication training improves care. It was an interview study of patients' experiences in one unit, and it did not test an intervention or compare outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →