RNRCTInternational journal of nursing sciences2018

Motivational interviewing to improve the self-care behaviors for patients with chronic heart failure: A randomized controlled trial.

Juan Chen, Hongwei Zhao, Shumin Hao and 3 others

PMID 31406827

WHAT IT FOUND

Among hospitalized adults with chronic heart failure, motivational interviewing plus telephone follow-up raised self-care scores more than routine nurse education plus routine telephone follow-up at 2 months.

Both groups improved, so this shows added short-term benefit, not that routine care fails.

Key findings

01The MI group received four in-hospital motivational interviewing sessions and telephone follow-up at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after discharge.

02The control group received conventional health education three or four times during hospitalization and routine telephone follow-up after discharge.

03At 2 months, self-care scores improved more in the MI group than in the control group (P < 0.01).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The authors call it a pilot study, and only 62 of 72 recruited patients completed follow-up, with some dropouts due to disease exacerbation. From 158 admitted patients, 86 were excluded for age, serious disease, communication difficulty, or refusal, so the sample may be highly selected. The study measured outcomes only 2 months after discharge, so it does not show whether the improvement lasts. MI was delivered by two investigators experienced in MI and cardiovascular nursing, and the authors note it requires substantial training, time, and interpersonal skill, so it may be hard to replicate without trained staff. The trial excluded patients older than 70, patients with cognitive impairment or mental disease, and patients with serious comorbidities, so it says little about frail or severely impaired patients. Both groups received telephone follow-up, so the effect of MI sessions cannot be separated from the effect of individualized phone follow-up. The reported outcome was the self-care questionnaire score.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the greater score change as proof that motivational interviewing sessions alone caused it. The intervention group also received telephone follow-up, and the control group also received routine telephone follow-up, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Do not assume the benefit lasts beyond the measured follow-up period.

Read it on PubMed →