Modified head shake sensory organization test: Sensitivity and specificity.
Julie A Honaker, Kristen L Janky, Jessie N Patterson and 1 others
PMID 27372458WHAT IT FOUND
A slow head shake on a sway-referenced platform best flagged vestibular asymmetry.
In the patient group, a score of 51.67 or lower caught 70% of asymmetry cases and ruled out 100% of those without asymmetry.
Key findings
01In the patient group, the slow head-shake sway-referenced condition identified peripheral vestibular asymmetry best, with a score of 51.67 or lower giving 70% sensitivity and 100% specificity.
02Patients with symptoms declined more steeply across the test conditions than healthy controls, and controls scored higher on the sway-referenced conditions.
03Two patients were unable to complete the slow head-shake condition that showed the best diagnostic accuracy.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included only 30 participants, and the authors say the small sample may not support immediate clinical use. It compared patients with symptoms to healthy controls, which can make a test look better than it would in a mixed clinic group. The healthy controls did not receive caloric testing, so some could have had undetected vestibular problems. The test conditions were presented in a fixed order, not randomised, because the authors wanted a pragmatic clinical sequence. Two patients could not complete the best-performing condition, so it may not work for everyone. Only horizontal head movements were tested, although daily life also involves pitch and roll movements. The authors note learning effects and poor reliability across trials with the EquiTest system. No comparison was made with video head impulse testing because it was not available at the start of the study.
The easy way to misread this
Do not treat this as ready for routine screening. The accuracy came from 30 people, and the best condition could not be completed by two patients.