PTOTSLPSurveyScandinavian journal of caring sciences2025

Missed Nursing Care in Danish Hospitals: A National Survey.

Hanne Mainz, Amanda Agnes Østervig Buus, Britt Laugesen and 3 others

PMID 40275787

WHAT IT FOUND

Nursing staff in Danish hospitals reported that 44% of necessary care elements are occasionally, frequently or always missed.

Ambulation, turning, mouth care and emotional support were most often missed, while vital signs and hand hygiene were prioritised. Staff shortages drove these omissions.

Key findings

01Overall, 44% of nursing care elements were reported as always, frequently or occasionally missed, with variation between hospitals ranging from 32% to 53%.

02The most frequently missed care elements included ambulation, turning patients, full documentation, mouth care, attending interdisciplinary conferences, emotional support and patient teaching.

03The main reasons for missed nursing care were inadequate staffing numbers and unexpected rises in patient volume and acuity.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The response rate was 39%, raising the risk of non-response bias. Staff in the busiest units, who might experience the highest levels of missed care, may have had less time to complete the survey, potentially leading to an underestimation of the problem. The data are self-reported and subject to recall bias and social desirability bias, where nurses might underreport missed care to present themselves or their units in a better light. The study focused only on adult patients in acute care somatic hospitals, so the findings may not apply to psychiatric, paediatric or primary care settings. The survey reflects the perspectives of nursing staff only; it does not include patient reports of care received, which might differ.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was supported by a steering committee including chief nursing officers and a representative from the Danish Nurses' Association, but the text does not specify direct funding sources or commercial involvement.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the 44% missed care rate as a measure of actual patient harm or clinical negligence in this specific dataset. The study reports the nurses' perception of how often care is missed, not the occurrence of adverse events. Furthermore, the low response rate (39%) means this may be an underestimation, as the busiest nurses with the most missed care were likely least able to respond.

Read it on PubMed →