Mechanics and energetics of post-stroke walking aided by a powered ankle exoskeleton with speed-adaptive myoelectric control.
Emily M McCain, Taylor J M Dick, Tracy N Giest and 4 others
PMID 31092269WHAT IT FOUND
In six people after stroke, a powered ankle exoskeleton did not reduce energy cost of walking.
It raised paretic ankle and limb power at the tested speeds, but two participants had lower cost and four had higher cost.
Key findings
01The speed-adaptive controller increased peak assistance as walking speed increased.
02Total paretic ankle power and paretic limb power increased with assistance, but paretic forward propulsion decreased.
03Whole-body metabolic cost did not improve with assistance: only two of six participants had a lower cost, and four had a higher cost.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only six people were studied, and fewer completed the higher speeds, so the findings are unstable. All participants had to walk at least 0.6 m/s overground, so it says nothing about slower walkers. Speeds were not randomised; each speed was reached by increasing the treadmill each minute, so acclimation and fatigue may have affected later speeds. Metabolic cost was calculated over the whole speed ramp, which can miss delayed effects of changes in effort. Participants had limited time to get used to the exoskeleton, and one minute per speed may not have been enough to adapt. The exoskeleton restricted ankle movement and may have limited other foot rotations. No instructions were given to help participants optimise the assistance.
Declared interests
The work was funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The supplied text does not state author conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the increased paretic ankle power as proof that walking became less costly. The whole-body metabolic cost did not improve, and only two of six participants had a lower cost while four had a higher cost.