RNOtherRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2020

Measurement of wound area for early analysis of the scar predictive factor.

Adriano Antonio Mehl, Bertoldo Schneider, Fabio Kurt Schneider and 1 others

PMID 32876286

WHAT IT FOUND

In 32 chronic wounds, a flexible transparent ruler with a computer method (Matlab) gave area estimates off by 2.86% against the reference method, while rigid ruler, caliper, and scalimeter estimates were off by 96.78%, 141.8%, and 188.58%.

Key findings

01In the 32 wounds studied, reported relative mean errors were 2.86% for Matlab, 96.78% for rigid ruler, 141.8% for Vernier caliper, and 188.58% for scalimeter.

02The three computer-assisted area methods showed no significant difference, with Pearson correlations of 0.999 for Digimizer and 0.998 for Matlab compared with Klonk.

03In the illustrated wound, manual 2D-FlexRuler estimation was +0.94% different from Klonk, while caliper with Kundin and traditional ruler were +32.97% and +52.63% different.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only 22 patients with 32 chronic wounds from a single outpatient clinic, so it cannot show how the ruler performs in many different wound settings. Klonk was chosen as the reference after comparing only three figures, so the accuracy claims are relative to that chosen standard, not an independent gold standard. The same researcher performed all assessments, dressing changes, and wound bed preparations, and also supplied the ruler and materials, which may introduce measurement bias. Highly exudative and circumferential lower-limb wounds were difficult to trace, and exudate had to be reduced to prevent slipping. Wound area can increase after debridement because of tissue flexibility, so area reduction alone is not a simple sign of healing. The study did not test patient healing outcomes or compare treatments; it compared measurement methods.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the 2D-FlexRuler improves healing or that wound area reduction proves a treatment works. The study measured area estimates in 22 patients with 32 wounds, and all wounds also received PHMB cleaning, debridement when needed, and topical agents such as PHMB gel, silver, or cadexomer iodine, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.

Read it on PubMed →