Maternal Depressive Symptoms and Perceived Picky Eating in a Low-Income, Primarily Hispanic Sample.
Michelle Katzow, Caitlin Canfield, Rachel S Gross and 5 others
PMID 31415306WHAT IT FOUND
Mothers with more depressive symptoms and negative views of interactions with their infant reported more perceived picky eating at 14 months.
Perceived pickiness was not linked to child diet or growth.
Key findings
01In 187 primarily Hispanic mother-child dyads, higher maternal depressive symptoms and more negative perceptions at child age 6 months were associated with more perceived picky eating at child age 14 months.
02Families receiving the VIP parenting intervention reported lower perceived picky eating scores than families not receiving it (10.9 vs 12.8).
03Perceived picky eating was not associated with dietary consumption of any measured food item, nor with child BMI z-scores at ages 14 months, 2 years, or 3 years.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a secondary analysis of data from a trial of a general parenting program, not a trial designed to test feeding outcomes. The trial did not target feeding behaviors as part of its curriculum. Picky eating was measured by mother report, not by watching the child eat, so the scores may reflect the mother's view as much as the child's behavior. Maternal depressive symptoms and negative perceptions were measured only at child age 6 months, so the study could not show which came first. The study did not measure feeding concerns before age 14 months, so it could not test whether early feeding worries led to later maternal distress. The sample was low-income and primarily Hispanic, so results may not apply to other families. Diet data were missing for 59 of 187 families, and those with diet data were more likely to be in the VIP group and less likely to have baseline psychosocial risk. Growth data were missing for 15 of 187 children. The control group combined usual care and Building Blocks, so the comparison was VIP versus a mixed control condition. VIP was a multi-session package, including video feedback and planning, so no single component can be credited.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the lower perceived picky eating score in VIP families as proof that the parenting intervention treats a child feeding problem. The outcome was the mother's report, the program did not target feeding, and the study did not establish a causal effect.