RNCohortJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2021

Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Mortality and Allocate Palliative Care for Older Patients With Hip Fracture.

Michael P Cary, Farica Zhuang, Rachel Lea Draelos and 5 others

PMID 33132014

WHAT IT FOUND

In 17,140 older adults after hip fracture, computer models flagged 30-day death better than one-year death, but a simple model performed like a complex one, and the paper says this use still needs pilot testing.

Key findings

01In 17,140 older adults discharged to inpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture, the models predicted 30-day death better than one-year death, with reported scores of 0.780 and 0.728 versus 0.684 and 0.681.

02Logistic regression and the neural network had similar performance for both 30-day and one-year mortality, and the difference in their ranking scores was of minimal clinical importance.

03The paper says implementation should be pilot-tested in inpatient rehabilitation facilities and the models would require validation in the electronic medical record.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The data were administrative claims and rehabilitation assessment records, so they lacked laboratory results, medications, and social or behavioral information. The sample was fee-for-service Medicare patients, so the models may not apply to people in Medicare Advantage plans. The data had a lag time, and the paper says the models would require validation in electronic medical records. The participants were mostly female and white, although the paper says that reflects the national hip fracture population. The decision threshold was chosen by a statistical index and did not take clinical judgment into account. The study did not examine how predictors change over time during follow-up. The models were evaluated by splitting the same data into folds, and the paper says they would require validation in the electronic medical record. The paper says implementation and translation should be pilot-tested to demonstrate benefits.

Declared interests

The supplied metadata lists NIH extramural research support. No author conflicts of interest are reported in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these models as ready-made tools for deciding who should get palliative care. They were built from 2014 to 2015 Medicare claims data, require validation in the electronic medical record, and the paper says implementation should be pilot-tested in inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

Read it on PubMed →