Longitudinal Changes in Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Children With Auditory Brainstem Implants: Preliminary Results Recorded Over 3 Years.
Shuman He, Holly F B Teagle, Tyler C McFayden and 4 others
PMID 28891823WHAT IT FOUND
In five children with auditory brainstem implants, brain responses to implant stimulation changed over months to years.
Some appeared later, some weakened or reversed. The study cannot show what the children actually heard.
Key findings
01S2 had no repeatable brain response at 9 months, then responses were recorded at 12 and 34 months.
02At 30 months, S3 had reversed-polarity responses and a response of 54.5 microvolts compared with about 2.6 microvolts earlier.
03For S4, brain-response repeatability decreased over time, while for S5 it remained stable.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only five children were tested, so the results cannot show how all children with auditory brainstem implants will change. The responses differed widely between children, and the study could not identify a clear reason for the changes. Some children had prior or contralateral cochlear implants, so changes cannot be assigned to the auditory brainstem implant alone. The children were young and had limited speech and language, so behavioral responses to sound were incomplete. The speech perception tests used were not sensitive enough to detect small changes over time. The study did not have imaging to confirm whether implant electrodes moved, so possible electrode migration remains speculative. The study describes brain responses, not hearing or speech outcomes, so it cannot show whether the implant improved function.
Declared interests
The paper is listed as supported by NIH extramural and non-U.S. government research support. Craig A. Buchman and Holly F.B. Teagle served on Cochlear Corp advisory boards; no other conflicts were declared.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the changing brain responses as proof that the implant improved hearing or speech. The study had five children, the changes were not consistent, and the authors say the behavioral meaning of the changes is unknown.