SLPCohortJournal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP2021

Longitudinal Associations Between Parenting Practices and Youth Sleep Problems.

Juliana Acosta, Justin Parent, Karissa DiMarzio and 3 others

PMID 33908375

WHAT IT FOUND

Parents with supportive warmth and low hostility had children with the fewest sleep problems.

This link was strongest in children aged 9 to 14. For younger children, parenting style did not significantly predict sleep issues. Addressing family conflict may help older youth sleep better.

Key findings

01Youth of parents in the 'Low Support' profile had the highest sleep problems, with 50% classified as clinically elevated compared to 12.5% in the 'High Support' group.

02The association between parenting profiles and sleep problems was significant for peripubertal youth (ages 9-14) but not for younger children (ages 3-8).

03Odds of being in a lower-support parenting profile increased by 11% for every year the child aged.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Data came from a single reporter (the parent), which risks bias in how they rated both their own parenting and their child's sleep. Sleep was measured by questionnaire, not by objective methods like actigraphy. The design is observational, so it cannot prove that parenting style causes sleep problems; it could be that children with poor sleep provoke negative parenting. The sample was recruited online and was not exclusively clinical, limiting generalisability to severe cases.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that changing parenting style will improve sleep for children under 9. The study found no significant link between parenting profiles and sleep problems in the younger age group (3-8 years); the effect was only present in peripubertal youth (9-14 years).

Read it on PubMed →