Long-term functional and clinical outcome of combined targeted muscle reinnervation and osseointegration for functional bionic reconstruction in transhumeral amputees: a case series.
Agnes Sturma, Anna Boesendorfer, Clemens Gstoettner and 7 others
PMID 38770700WHAT IT FOUND
Disability scores improved after bone anchoring, nerve rerouting, prosthetic training and fitting.
The men used the prosthesis daily and felt it was part of their body. Because several treatments were given together, no single component can be credited.
Key findings
01Primary DASH disability scores improved in all 3 patients: from 45.8 to 23.3, from 20 to 10.8, and from 57.1 to 37.5 on a 0 to 100 scale.
02The patients used the prosthesis daily for 6 to 15 hours and rated feeling that it was part of their body at 8 or 10 on a 0 to 10 scale.
03Functional hand test scores were below normal at follow-up: SHAP scores were 30, 29 and 31 out of 100, and ARAT scores were 31, 30 and 24 out of 57.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 3 male transhumeral amputees were included, so the results cannot be generalised to other amputee groups. There was no control group or comparison group, so the paper cannot show that the surgery caused the reported improvements. The patients received bone anchoring, nerve rerouting, rehabilitation, prosthetic training and fitting together, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The patients differed in surgery timing, nerve transfers, rehabilitation protocol, prosthesis, and electrode method. Patient 1 had a very short humerus of about 6 cm and limited shoulder movement with the prosthesis. Patient 1's prosthesis wearing time decreased before assessment because he felt shoulder overuse. Patient 3 had 2 soft tissue corrections due to weight changes. Functional tests and embodiment were assessed only at follow-up for patients 2 and 3, so there is no before comparison for them. Patients who choose invasive procedures may differ from the general population.
Declared interests
The project received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 grant agreement No 810346. No other conflicts of interest are reported in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that bone anchoring or nerve rerouting alone caused the improvement. The patients also received rehabilitation, prosthetic training and fitting, and only 3 cases were reported without a control group.