PTRCTNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2020

Locomotor Kinematics and Kinetics Following High-Intensity Stepping Training in Variable Contexts Poststroke.

Marzieh M Ardestani, Christopher E Henderson, Gordhan Mahtani and 2 others

PMID 32507027

WHAT IT FOUND

High-intensity stepping training improved walking speed more than low-intensity training, but biomechanical changes were limited and varied by training type.

Variable high-intensity training showed more paretic-limb joint power and coordination changes than low-intensity training.

Key findings

01Both high-intensity training groups improved overground self-selected speed and peak treadmill speed more than the low-intensity group.

02High-intensity variable training produced greater non-paretic ankle power and paretic hip power changes than low-intensity training, and its change patterns were concentrated in the paretic limb.

03At speeds matched to baseline, there were no spatiotemporal differences between groups and only a few kinematic or kinetic differences remained.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The analysis included only 50 participants with valid kinematic data and 42 with valid kinetic data after marker loss, dropouts, inability to walk at 0.1 m/s, and laboratory transition. The paper is a secondary analysis of a previous randomized trial, not the primary report of that trial. The authors state that the small sample size within each training group is a primary limitation. Participants had to be able to walk at least 0.1 m/s on the treadmill and place each limb on separate belts, so the results do not apply to people who cannot meet those testing requirements. When post-training speeds were matched to baseline speeds, only a few differences remained, so some findings may depend on faster walking after training. The authors state additional work is needed to confirm these findings across larger, more diverse patient populations.

Declared interests

The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The publication types list NIH extramural and U.S. government non-P.H.S. research support.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that variable high-intensity training causes neurological recovery or reduces compensatory movement. The study is a small secondary analysis with missing biomechanical data, and the authors state additional work is needed to confirm the findings.

Read it on PubMed →