SLPOtherCoDAS2026

Localization and validation of the "Growing Up With Hearing Loss" tool for Brazilian Portuguese.

Daniele Baptista Nery, Aline Daniela Gomes da Silva Vieira, Anderson Vinícius de Moraes Ortega and 6 others

PMID 42054184

WHAT IT FOUND

The Growing Up With Hearing Loss counselling tool translated well into Brazilian Portuguese: children, parents and speech-language pathologists agreed the content was clear and useful.

Young adults rated it slightly below the acceptance cut-off and children struggled with the video subtitles.

Key findings

01Agreement with the translated tool reached the preset threshold in the children and adolescents group (76.5%), the parents and guardians group (83.3%) and the speech-language pathologist group (92.9%).

02Young adults with hearing loss rated the tool 74%, just below the agreed minimum, and asked for more detail on cochlear implants and on ways of interacting by age group.

03Children and adolescents reported difficulty reading the video subtitles, while the speech-language pathologists said the texts were long enough to demotivate teenagers and the navigation was unattractive.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 7 children and adolescents and 7 young adults took part, and the researchers ran no statistical comparisons between groups, so the differences between the four agreement rates are descriptions rather than tested effects. Participants were recruited in person and through social media and answered remotely, which favours people with internet access and comfort using digital technology. The videos kept their original recordings with Portuguese subtitles only, which is likely why children and adolescents reported difficulty reading them; no dubbing or sign language version was tested. Back-translation was not performed, so equivalence with the original English relied on expert review rather than on translating the text back and comparing it. Cronbach's alpha in the children and adolescents group was negative (-1.15), so the internal consistency of that questionnaire could not be established. The material's usefulness and effect on rehabilitation outcomes were never measured; participants only judged its clarity and content.

Declared interests

Funded by CAPES (Financing Code 001) and FAPESP (2024/10070-0, 2024/05187-6). The tool's copyright holder, the Ida Institute, gave formal authorisation for the localisation, which was carried out under an academic cooperation agreement between the Ida Institute and FOB-USP, so the developer of the material was a partner in the project.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the high agreement rates as evidence that the tool improves hearing rehabilitation. The 42 participants rated the translated material's clarity and usefulness, no patient outcomes were measured, and the four groups were never compared statistically, so this is a judgement about content, not about whether the tool works.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →