Language-specific approaches to reduce perioperative stress and anxiety related to anaesthesia for patients with limited English proficiency: A narrative review.
Kanwarpreet Kaur Dhaliwal, Sherry Sandhu, Nitasha Puri and 1 others
PMID 39949150WHAT IT FOUND
For patients with limited English proficiency, perioperative anxiety appears linked to not understanding anaesthesia information.
Native-language education, reliable interpreters and culturally adapted materials may help, but no method is proven to reduce anaesthesia stress.
Key findings
01Lower perioperative knowledge is associated with increased perioperative anxiety, and 28.7% of patients in an anaesthesia communication study said they did not understand their anaesthetist's explanation.
02Spanish-speaking parents who watched a Spanish pre-anaesthesia video had a 3-point decrease on the APAIS scale compared with those who did not, but statistical significance could not be verified because of low sample size.
03When anaesthesia interpreter services were used, communication improved 66.7% of the time, but 96% of interpreters serving a Boston anaesthesia department reported no anaesthesia-specific training.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This is a narrative review, not a systematic review, so it was not designed to establish whether any approach reduces anxiety. The search and selection were done by a single researcher, which limits reproducibility and may have introduced bias. Only a small number of studies were included, and some were excluded to reduce redundancy, so the evidence base is narrow. The included studies focused mainly on Indigenous Australian and Hispanic populations, so findings may not apply to all patients with limited English proficiency. The review relied mainly on English-language studies and a limited database, so relevant studies may have been missed. Publication bias was not accounted for, so negative or null results may be underrepresented. Many findings are associations or small studies, not tested effects, and significance was not always verified.
Declared interests
The author(s) declared no conflicts of interest. Funding was reported as support from the University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine through the Florence E. Summer Research Award and by Fraser Health Authority.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that native-language education, interpreters or workforce diversity reduce perioperative anxiety. The review was not systematic, was screened by a single researcher, and some included studies were small or did not verify significance.