PTPilotJournal of physical therapy science2021

Investigation of inspiratory intercostal muscle activity in patients with spinal cord injury: a pilot study using electromyography, ultrasonography, and respiratory inductance plethysmography.

Ryo Yoshida, Kazuhide Tomita, Kenta Kawamura and 7 others

PMID 33642691

WHAT IT FOUND

Surface EMG and ultrasound showed little change in inspiratory intercostal muscle activity or thickness from rest to deep breath in people with cervical spinal cord injury.

Rib cage movement tended to be larger when inspiratory capacity was larger.

Key findings

01Surface EMG and ultrasound did not show notable changes in inspiratory intercostal muscle activity or thickness from rest to maximum inspiration.

02The rib cage volume from the chest band measure tended to be higher in patients with greater inspiratory capacity.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only three patients were studied, so the findings cannot show how common these patterns are. The measurements were taken at one location for EMG and ultrasound, so activity or thickness changes elsewhere may have been missed. No treatment or follow-up was tested, so the paper does not show that these measures track change after respiratory training. All three patients had AIS D injuries, so the findings may not apply to people with more severe cervical injuries. The rib cage volume and inspiratory capacity values were reported as individual case values, not as a tested predictor.

Declared interests

The authors received no specific funding and declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the chest band rib cage measure is a validated clinical way to assess inspiratory intercostal muscle function. This was a pilot study, and the authors state that a larger cohort is needed.

Read it on PubMed →