RNSystematic ReviewIssues in mental health nursing2025

Interventions for Psychological Stress in Pregnant African American Women: A Scoping Review.

Taleah A Frazier, Charity Lackey, Amnazo Muhirwa and 3 others

PMID 41082768

WHAT IT FOUND

Stress interventions for pregnant African American women showed mixed results.

Quantitative data did not consistently prove reduced stress, but participants valued culturally matched support and mind-body techniques. Current evidence is too sparse to recommend specific protocols as effective treatments.

Key findings

01Quantitative outcomes for psychological stress were mixed, with some studies showing significant reductions and others showing no difference between intervention and control groups.

02Qualitative themes indicated that cultural matching and racial concordance with staff were highly valued by participants, fostering trust and a sense of being supported.

03Interventions were multifaceted, commonly combining education, social support, and mind-body exercises, but the evidence base is limited to only two randomized controlled trials.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review included only 8 studies, a small number compared to typical scoping reviews, reflecting a sparse evidence base. Only two studies were randomized controlled trials, limiting the strength of causal inferences. Most studies used standardized stress measures that may not be culturally validated for African American women. The review excluded non-English articles and one study was not retrievable.

Declared interests

No conflicts of interest were reported in the provided text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the positive qualitative feedback as evidence that these interventions effectively reduce physiological or psychological stress outcomes. The quantitative data was mixed, and the evidence base is too small to support changing clinical protocols based on efficacy alone.

Read it on PubMed →