OTCohortAustralian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses2023

Interrelationships among workload, illness severity, and function on return to work following acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Han Su, Hilaire J Thompson, Kenneth Pike and 6 others

PMID 35210156

WHAT IT FOUND

Illness severity and function at 6 months were linked to return to work in 329 ARDS survivors.

Work at 6 months was the strongest observed link to work at 12 months. These are links, not proof.

Key findings

01Greater illness severity was linked to lower return to work at 6 months across the cognitive, psychological, interpersonal, and physical models.

02Psychological, interpersonal, and physical function at 6 months were linked to higher return to work at 6 months, but cognitive function was not.

03Work at 6 months was the factor most strongly linked to work at 12 months in all four models.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was an observational study, so it cannot show that function, illness severity, or early work caused later employment. Follow-up stopped at 12 months, so it does not show whether these links hold later. Each function domain was modelled separately, so the study cannot determine the relative importance of combined cognitive, psychological, interpersonal, and physical disability. Cognitive function was measured only with the MMSE, which had small variability and fair to moderate agreement with comprehensive testing, and it did not show a direct link to work. Physical and psychological function were measured by self-report SF-36 subscales rather than performance tests. Participants who retired during follow-up were excluded, and the reason for retirement was unknown. The job workload measure was based on a US occupational database and may not apply in other countries. The results text reports 52% and 55% working at 6 and 12 months, while Table 1 reports 52% and 56%.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts. The analysis used data from the National Institutes of Health-funded ARDS Network Long-Term Outcomes Study, supported by NHLBI contracts and grants, and one author received a University of Washington dissertation award.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read work at 6 months as proof that early return to work causes employment at 12 months. This was an observational study, and it showed associations, not tested effects.

Read it on PubMed →