SLPPilotJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025

Integration of Family Navigation into ECHO Autism for Pediatric Primary Care in Underserved Communities.

Micah O Mazurek, Rose E Nevill, Karen Orlando and 3 others

PMID 38954361

WHAT IT FOUND

Pediatric primary care clinicians in underserved Virginia areas reported greater confidence in autism screening, referral, and managing co-occurring conditions after a 12-month videoconference training with family navigation.

Families also received navigation help, but child and service-access outcomes were not measured.

Key findings

01Total self-efficacy improved significantly from 180.36 to 265.18 among the 28 pediatric clinicians who completed both pre and post surveys.

02Pediatric clinics referred 258 families for family navigation, and 83% of those families were referred for help accessing or connecting with services.

03The program combined pediatric clinician training and family navigation, and it had no control group, so the contribution of either component alone cannot be separated.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 28 of 42 pediatric clinicians completed both pre and post surveys, so the self-efficacy change is based on that smaller analysed group. There was no control or comparison group, so the improvement cannot be separated from time, maturation, or other changes. The program combined pediatric clinician training and family navigation, so the contribution of either component alone cannot be separated. The study did not include direct measures of child or family outcomes, such as age at diagnosis, age at intervention, time between referral and access, or family stress. Results are self-report from clinicians who volunteered and attended an average of 67.6% of sessions, so they may not show actual practice change. The study was a pilot in Virginia, so it may not apply to other regions or health systems.

Declared interests

The supplied text states that the funder was the Maternal and Child Health Bureau. It does not provide an author conflict-of-interest statement.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the self-efficacy increase as proof that children got earlier diagnosis or services. The study had no control group, only 28 of 42 clinicians completed both surveys, and it did not measure child or family outcomes.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →