PTOtherJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019

Individualized feedback to change multiple gait deficits in chronic stroke.

Kevin A Day, Kendra M Cherry-Allen, Amy J Bastian

PMID 31870390

WHAT IT FOUND

Stroke survivors used visual feedback to increase paretic knee flexion and improve gait symmetry in one session.

Verbal instructions about specific joint movements hindered their progress, whereas the feedback alone allowed them to explore and achieve better walking patterns without explicit guidance.

Key findings

01Participants with chronic stroke significantly improved their gait pattern toward a healthy goal when using visual feedback, specifically by increasing paretic knee flexion.

02Explicit verbal instructions on how to alter joint kinematics did not improve performance in the stroke group, while healthy controls benefited from such instructions.

03Training with visual feedback led to an increase in vertical ankle clearance during late swing, which may reduce tripping risk.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Small sample size of ten participants in each group. The study focused only on sagittal plane kinematics, ignoring potential compensatory movements in other planes. The stroke group had lower cognitive scores than the control group, which may have influenced their ability to process verbal instructions. Performance gains were measured within a single session or two sessions, so long-term retention and functional carryover are unknown.

Declared interests

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that verbal cues to 'bend your knee more' are universally effective for gait retraining. In this study, adding specific joint instructions prevented the stroke group from improving, suggesting that exploratory learning via visual feedback may be more effective for some patients.

Read it on PubMed →