RNOtherJournal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society2018

Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis, Characteristics and Relationship to Pressure Injury: A Multisite Epidemiologic Analysis.

Mikel Gray, Karen K Giuliano

PMID 29300291

WHAT IT FOUND

In acute care, skin damage from incontinence was found in 45.7% of incontinent patients, and 73% developed after admission.

It was linked to stool incontinence, urine and stool together, immobility, and facility-acquired sacral pressure injury. Nurses should check skin in these patients.

Key findings

01In acute care, 45.7% of patients with urinary, fecal, or dual incontinence had IAD, and 73% of those IAD cases developed during the hospital stay.

02Patients with fecal incontinence had more IAD than those with urinary incontinence (44.7% vs 29.7%), and immobile patients had more IAD than mobile patients (39.9% vs 7.4%).

03Patients with IAD had more facility-acquired sacral pressure injury (32.3% vs 6.3%) and more facility-acquired full-thickness sacral pressure injury (6.4% vs 1.5%).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The data were collected on one day, so this is a snapshot and cannot show how IAD or pressure injuries developed over time. Survey fields were not mandatory, so missing data may have affected the reported rates. Nurses did not receive specific training in assessing IAD or pressure injury, and no validated instrument was used for IAD severity, so classification may vary. The study used existing quality data and did not compare treatments, so it cannot show that preventing IAD prevents pressure injury. Facilities used a variety of products and interventions, and the units were selected as high risk for pressure injury, so the results may not apply to all acute care patients. The analysis did not establish the timing of IAD relative to pressure injury, so it cannot show which came first.

Declared interests

The supplied text does not report funding or author conflict of interest declarations. The IAD prevalence database was maintained by Sage Products.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that preventing IAD prevents pressure injuries. This was a one-day observational study of existing skin conditions, not a trial of any treatment, and it could not determine whether IAD appeared before pressure injuries or after them.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
5342 adult patients; 2492 had urinary, fecal, or dual incontinence
Certainty of evidence
Low

More in medical-surgical

Browse

Cite

Mikel Gray, Karen K Giuliano Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis, Characteristics and Relationship to Pressure Injury: A Multisite Epidemiologic Analysis. Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 2018.

Read the original