Incidence and risk factors of pressure injuries in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Aline de Oliveira Ramalho, Rodrigo Augusto Gonçalves Fonseca, Eliane Mazócoli and 2 others
PMID 38055426WHAT IT FOUND
Critically ill patients with COVID-19 in one Brazilian ICU developed pressure injuries at 30.2%, including 8.8% device-related.
Nurses should flag mechanical ventilation, diabetes, immunosuppression, nutritional risk, longer ICU stay, and older age.
Key findings
01Pressure injury incidence was 30.2% (202/668), and medical device-related pressure injury incidence was 8.8% (59/668).
02In adjusted logistic regression, pressure injury was associated with mechanical ventilation (odds ratio 3.52), diabetes (2.07), immunosuppression (3.40), nutritional risk (1.99), ICU stay length (1.11), and age in years (1.06).
03Medical device-related pressure injuries were mainly associated with ventilatory assistance devices, followed by enteral feeding catheters.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a retrospective single-centre study based on records, so data may be incomplete and the findings may not apply to other hospitals. Some key data were missing: Braden risk was available for 603 patients and nutritional risk for 630. The study included only patients with COVID-19, so it cannot show that COVID-19 itself caused the higher pressure injury incidence. Many patients received several ICU supports at once, such as mechanical ventilation, sedation, neuromuscular blockers, prone positioning and devices, so the independent effect of any single support cannot be separated. The Braden Scale is widely used but not specific for critically ill adults; it had moderate predictive validity, good sensitivity and low specificity in a prior review. Pandemic workload, supply shortages and limited implementation of prevention measures may have influenced the incidence.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that mechanical ventilation caused pressure injuries or that the ICU prevention bundle reduced them. This was a retrospective observational study in one ICU, and patients often received mechanical ventilation, sedation, neuromuscular blockers, prone positioning and devices together, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.