OTCohortJournal of occupational rehabilitation2025

Inability to Work Fulltime and the Association with Paid Employment One Year After the Work Disability Assessment: A Longitudinal Register-Based Cohort Study.

Henk-Jan Boersema, Tialda Hoekstra, Raun van Ooijen and 3 others

PMID 38819462

WHAT IT FOUND

Being assessed as unable to work fulltime was not associated with paid employment one year later after adjustment.

The chance was higher for working musculoskeletal applicants and lower for some cancer and respiratory applicants.

Key findings

01In applicants working at baseline, the adjusted association between inability to work fulltime and paid employment one year later was not significant (OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.92-1.43).

02In applicants not working at baseline, no significant association was found.

03In disease-group analyses, working applicants with musculoskeletal disease had higher odds (OR 2.19, 95%CI 1.20-4.00), while working applicants with neoplasms and non-working applicants with respiratory disease had lower odds at p<0.10 (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.13-1.19; OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.02-1.12).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is an observational register study, not a trial, so it cannot show that being assessed as unable to work fulltime caused any change in employment. Disease severity, symptoms, motivation, job support and actual work accommodations were not measured, so they may explain part of the associations. The sample only includes applicants granted a partial disability benefit, not those with full or no benefit. The analysis did not separate how many hours per day someone was assessed as able to work. Several disease-group findings came from subgroup tests, and the paper notes a risk of false-positive findings from multiple testing. Employers were not given the assessment results, so the study cannot show how employers used the information.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that assessing inability to work fulltime improves or harms employment. The adjusted overall association was null, and the disease-group findings are observational subgroup associations, not evidence that reduced hours caused employment changes.

Read it on PubMed →