RNOtherJournal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society

Improving Vascular Access Dressing Integrity in the Acute Care Setting: A Quality Improvement Project.

Michelle DeVries, Jill Sarbenoff, Nancy Scott and 2 others

PMID 34198309

WHAT IT FOUND

For nurses managing peripheral IV dressings, adding gum mastic adhesive to transparent dressings reached 93% and 83% intact in small protocol samples, while education alone reached 57% and 9%.

Key findings

01Education with the original 3M dressing reached 57% intact (76/134), and the updated 3M dressing alone reached 9% intact (1/11).

02Adding gum mastic adhesive achieved 93% intact (26/28) with the Centurion dressing and 83% intact (19/23) with the updated 3M dressing.

03After standardizing the updated 3M dressing with adhesive and education, 29081 of 30049 vascular access sites had fully intact dressings (96.78%).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was a quality improvement project, not a randomized controlled trial, so it cannot show that the adhesive alone caused the improvement. The four protocols were introduced one after another, so education, dressing product, adhesive, and time changed together. The protocol samples were small, especially the updated dressing alone (1/11), and one protocol was stopped early. The main outcome was dressing appearance at day 7 or device removal, not bloodstream infection or patient harm. Nurses knew the goal and were educated by the project team, and unit-reported integrity may be inflated. Skin injury data came from reports, consults, and rounds; later cases show medical adhesive-related skin injuries were not impossible.

Declared interests

No funding was received. One author disclosed speaker bureau affiliations with Becton Dickinson, Eloquest, Ethicon, Smiths Medical, The Clinician Exchange, 3M, and Teleflex, plus unrelated grant funding from Johnson & Johnson and honoraria from Kurin; the remaining authors reported no conflicts. Manufacturer clinical support staff helped educate nurses during the project.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that adding gum mastic adhesive prevents bloodstream infections. This quality improvement project measured dressing integrity and reported skin complications, not infection rates, and the protocols were introduced sequentially without a control group.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
Dressings/sites, not patients: 2 IMCUs (65 beds total); protocol samples 134, 11, 28, 23; postimplementation 8442 of 8918 and 30049 sites
Certainty of evidence
Low

More in medical-surgical

Browse

Cite

Michelle DeVries, Jill Sarbenoff, Nancy Scott, et al. Improving Vascular Access Dressing Integrity in the Acute Care Setting: A Quality Improvement Project. Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

Read the original