PTOTOtherArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2021

Improving the Delivery of Function-Directed Care During Acute Hospitalizations: Methods to Develop and Validate the Functional Assessment in Acute Care Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test (FAMCAT).

Andrea L Cheville, Chun Wang, Kathleen J Yost and 8 others

PMID 34179750

WHAT IT FOUND

A computerized test for hospitalized patients was built to measure mobility, daily activities and thinking with fewer questions.

Its scoring levels matched nurse or cognitive screen ratings only partly, and its effect on care is not yet shown.

Key findings

01The FAMCAT item bank was expanded to 326 items across Basic Mobility, Daily Activities and Applied Cognitive.

02The team used three functional domains in the final model, even though a four-domain model fit the calibration data better.

03Proposed FAMCAT cut scores agreed with nurse or Mini-Cog classifications 69%, 59.6% and 71.8% of the time.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This paper reports instrument development and selected psychometric checks, not a test of whether FAMCAT changes therapy, discharge or patient function. Validation designs for discharge location, readmission, convergent validity, mode and proxy effects are described, but their results are not reported. Participant counts differ across the text and tables, for example 2341 calibration patients recruited, 2024 in a table, and 2154 validation patients versus 2050 in a table. Therapist assessments occurred for only 15% and 12% of participants, so cut scores relied mainly on nurse ratings. The item bank was adapted from post-acute care measures, and items about gait aids and wheelchairs were removed because they were less relevant to hospital settings. The final three-factor model was chosen even though a four-factor model fit better, because the cognitive factor was not explored further. Response times reduced uncertainty in patient estimates but were not included in the final algorithm. Eligibility required English fluency and excluded patients needing ventilatory support or certain medications, so it may not apply to more impaired acute patients. Patients admitted to neurology or readmitted to neurosurgery were not recruited because therapy was routine for them.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that FAMCAT improves function-directed care or predicts discharge and readmission. This paper reports development and some measurement checks; it does not report the clinical validation results.

Read it on PubMed →