SLPOtherResearch in developmental disabilities2023

Implementing a scientifically based educational intervention in mainstream primary schools before and during COVID-19 era: Evidence from Greek-speaking children.

Styliani N Tsesmeli, Ioanna Skarmoutsou

PMID 37423051

WHAT IT FOUND

Greek third- and fourth-graders who received teacher-led morphological sessions improved their spelling and word-meaning scores; classmates who received usual teaching did not.

Key findings

01Children in the training groups improved their spelling accuracy significantly, while the control groups did not show significant spelling improvement.

02The training groups also improved their meaning accuracy significantly, while the control groups did not show significant meaning improvement.

03Children with low and high spelling ability in the training groups improved spelling and meaning significantly compared with control groups of the same ability.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The children were not randomly assigned to groups, and the paper does not report blinding or dropout. The sample was 72 Greek monolingual children from 2 mainstream primary schools, with no reported mental, hearing, visual or serious health problems, so the results may not apply to other languages, school settings, or children with other conditions. The control groups received usual classroom literacy activities, not a matched active program, so the study cannot separate the effect of morphological content from extra classroom activity, teacher attention, or materials. The training was brief and delivered during pandemic disruption, and the paper reports the period as 2 months in one place and 3 months in another. The authors state that wider samples, broader age ranges, and longer follow-up are needed.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the gains as proof that morphological instruction alone caused improvement. The training was delivered by class teachers with materials, classroom group work, and remote support through Skype, and the groups were not randomly assigned, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.

Read it on PubMed →