Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices: Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs.
Chris J Main, Michael K Nicholas, William S Shaw and 3 others
PMID 27796914WHAT IT FOUND
Workplace return-to-work programs for musculoskeletal injuries often stall because of employer and organizational factors, not just clinical care.
Therapists should expect and address leadership, culture, readiness, and modified-duty barriers before assuming a good treatment will be adopted.
Key findings
01Despite guideline support, workplace-focused return-to-work practices vary widely, and organizational obstacles can prevent implementation and harm outcomes.
02A brief keyword search found nine articles describing 89 implementation factors that fit a four-phase framework from exploration to sustainment.
03In a survey of 232 companies, 45% had formal and 55% had informal return-to-work programs; 42% had no systematic evaluation method and 78% had no way to measure return on investment.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This is a narrative review and conceptual paper, not a controlled trial, so it does not test whether an implementation framework improves return-to-work. The keyword search was brief and not reported as a full systematic review, so it may miss relevant articles. The employer survey and case example numbers are reported from cited or ongoing work, not as fully published controlled results; the paper says final results were not available. It focuses on musculoskeletal workplace injuries and employer disability practices, so it may not apply to other patient groups or clinical settings. No funding or conflict of interest declaration is included in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the 22% savings and 30 versus 56 lost work days as proof the screening program works. The paper says final results were not available, and the case is used to illustrate implementation factors rather than to establish efficacy.