OTOtherJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Impact of transradial amputation and brachial plexus injury on vibrotactile sensation capacity of the upper extremity.

L A Pardo, A F Schilling, M A Wilke and 3 others

PMID 42143390

WHAT IT FOUND

Five people with transradial amputation felt vibration on the residual limb and shoulder similarly to able-bodied controls.

Three of six people with brachial plexus injury could not feel lower-arm vibration at maximum intensity, while shoulder ability to tell vibration strength was similar to benchmark.

Key findings

01People with transradial amputation did not differ from the able-bodied benchmark in vibrotactile sensation threshold or real-time tracking with tactile feedback.

02People with brachial plexus injury had higher sensation thresholds than the benchmark across all tested arm regions.

03People with brachial plexus injury had worse intensity discrimination in the lower and upper arm than in the benchmark.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study had only five participants with transradial amputation and six with brachial plexus injury, and the authors called it underpowered, exploratory, and mostly qualitative in group comparisons. One participant with brachial plexus injury stopped before the tracking task, so only five are represented in those tracking results. The affected limb was at rest and the joystick was controlled with the unaffected hand, so the tasks do not show how feedback works during real prosthesis control. Phantom hand maps were not assessed systematically, so the study cannot describe how referred phantom sensations relate to vibrotactile perception. All participants with brachial plexus injury had complete C5-Th1 avulsion, but surgical reconstruction and time since injury varied, limiting generalization to other injury patterns. The able-bodied benchmark was taken from a previous study, although it was collected in the same laboratory with the same equipment and experimenter. Only one tactor type and one vibration frequency, 230 Hz, were tested, so perception at other frequencies was not measured.

Declared interests

Funded by Medizinische Hochschule Hannover under grant 3118. The supplied text does not report author conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that vibrotactile feedback will improve real prosthetic control in these patients. The study tested sensation in a quiet laboratory, with the affected limb at rest and the joystick controlled by the unaffected hand, and it was underpowered.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →