SLPOtherDysphagia2022

Impact of Limb Phenotype on Tongue Denervation Atrophy, Dysphagia Penetrance, and Survival Time in a Mouse Model of ALS.

Marissa Mueller, Rebecca Thompson, Kate L Osman and 8 others

PMID 35426522

WHAT IT FOUND

In ALS mice, tongue muscle atrophy did not differ between hindlimb-only and forelimb-involving groups.

Forelimb involvement was associated with more consistent swallowing deficits, but this is animal data.

Key findings

01Tongue muscle fiber size was smaller in ALS mice than in wild-type controls, but hindlimb-only and forelimb-involving ALS mice did not differ.

02Forelimb-involving mice had videofluoroscopic evidence of dysphagia in 100% of cases, compared with 64% of hindlimb-only mice.

03Survival age did not differ between hindlimb-only and forelimb-involving ALS mice, and the combined average survival age was 8.7 months.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a mouse ALS model, not a human treatment study, so it cannot change swallowing care for people with ALS. The forelimb-involving group was very small at first, with only 5 mice, and 8 more were added later. Six of the 44 mice did not drink during swallowing testing and were excluded from the main swallowing analysis. Histological analysis used only 16 mice, including 4 hindlimb-only and 4 forelimb-involving ALS mice. Only the posterior part of one tongue muscle was examined. Swallowing and muscle changes were measured only at disease end-stage, not early in the disease. The humane endpoint was 15 to 20% weight loss, and mice could still eat and drink, which may affect survival comparisons. The authors combined two forelimb-involving patterns into one mixed phenotype group, which may hide differences between subtypes. Limb phenotype was not predictable from the breeder phenotype; offspring were assigned by chance at about 50%.

Declared interests

The supplied text lists NIH extramural research support. It does not include a competing-interests declaration.

The easy way to misread this

Do not apply these mouse dysphagia percentages to people with ALS. The study did not test treatment in patients, and the tongue muscle findings were measured in a small animal model.

Read it on PubMed →