Impact of COVID-19 on General Medical Rehabilitation Efficiency in Designated Inpatient Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Patient Outcomes and Care Processes.
Perrine Ferré, Yang Han, Louis-David Beaulieu and 3 others
PMID 40980531WHAT IT FOUND
Patients who caught COVID-19 during rehab gained functional independence 26.7% slower daily than prepandemic patients, despite similar discharge scores.
Their longer stays diluted progress. Infection control and resource shifts likely compromised care quality for this group specifically.
Key findings
01Patients who acquired COVID-19 during rehabilitation showed a 26.7% lower daily gain in functional independence compared with the prepandemic reference group.
02Final functional independence scores at discharge and the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvement did not significantly differ between groups.
03Higher numbers of rehabilitation professionals involved in care were associated with lower functional efficiency, suggesting complex cases required more resources for slower gains.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study relied on medical records, which limited the scope of data to total FIM scores rather than specific motor or cognitive subscales. There was a high rate of missing data for FIM discharge assessments in the groups that acquired or had COVID-19 on admission, which required listwise deletion and reduced the sample size for the efficiency model. Age and medical diagnoses were not controlled for in the initial comparison, although they were included in the final model. The findings are based on a single health care system (Québec), so results may not apply to regions where length of stay is influenced by insurance or different institutional policies. The study could not separate the effect of any single component of care, such as isolation protocols versus resource reallocation, on the observed outcomes.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was approved by the Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that COVID-19 infection itself directly causes long-term functional impairment. The study shows that the *process* of care was disrupted for those who acquired the infection in the facility, leading to slower daily gains and longer stays, but final discharge scores were similar to other groups. The negative association between professional involvement and efficiency reflects case complexity, not that more therapy is harmful.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →