RNMeta-AnalysisNursing open2025

Impact of Care Bundles Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ayse Silanur Demir, Ayise Karadag

PMID 40083077

WHAT IT FOUND

Care bundles reduced hospital-acquired pressure injuries, shortened hospital stays, and lowered the number of pressure injuries compared with standard care.

Nurses can deliver standardised bundles, but they should not assume one item caused the benefit.

Key findings

01Care bundles reduced the odds of developing hospital-acquired pressure injuries by 57.6% compared with standard care.

02Length of stay was shorter with care bundles than with standard care, with a medium effect size.

03Fewer pressure injuries developed in patients receiving care bundles than in patients receiving standard care.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Six of the nine studies were quasi-experimental before-and-after studies, so other changes over time may explain the results. The included care bundles were not standard: they had three to nine components, and the review did not test which component mattered. There was substantial heterogeneity for the primary outcome, so the pooled effect may not apply to every hospital, patient group, or bundle. Risk-of-bias concerns were common for deviations from intended intervention, missing outcome data, and outcome measurement. Most studies were conducted in intensive care units, so the findings may not transfer to general wards. Pressure injury severity was reported in only seven studies and could not be pooled; one randomised trial found no significant difference in severity. The article reports 29,572 patients in the results but 29,617 in the conclusion.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the 57.6% odds reduction as proof that a single item such as repositioning or support surfaces caused the benefit. The bundles varied from three to nine components, six studies were quasi-experimental, and heterogeneity was substantial.

Read it on PubMed →