PTRCTJournal of physical therapy science2018

Immediate effect of application of the pressure technique to the psoas major on lumbar lordosis.

Takahiro Otsudo, Kazuya Mimura, Kiyokazu Akasaka

PMID 30349172

WHAT IT FOUND

Deep pressure on the psoas muscle did not change overall lumbar curve, but it shifted the curve at specific lower spine segments.

The effect was small and seen only in young, healthy men, so it does not yet justify changing manual therapy for back pain.

Key findings

01There were no significant differences in lumbar lordosis in either the psoas pressure technique group or the control group.

02The lumbar extension angle at L4 decreased significantly after the psoas pressure technique compared with both before the technique and the control group.

03The lumbar extension angle at L1 increased significantly after the psoas pressure technique compared with before.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only young, healthy males, so results may not apply to older adults, females, or people with low back pain. The sample size was small (34 participants), limiting the power to detect subtle effects. The pressure was applied to only a small area of the psoas, so the effect of treating other regions is unknown. The study measured immediate effects only, so it is unclear how long any changes in spinal segment angles last. The actual change in psoas stiffness was not measured directly, only inferred from spinal angle changes.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the significant change at the L4 segment as evidence that this technique effectively reduces overall lumbar lordosis or stiffness in patients with back pain. The primary outcome was null, and the study was conducted on healthy young men, not a clinical population.

Read it on PubMed →