PTOTSLPRCTJournal of physical therapy science2022

Home training with or without joint mobilization compared to no treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

Anna Eliason, Suzanne Werner, Björn Engström and 1 others

PMID 35221520

WHAT IT FOUND

Home training with or without joint mobilization did not improve overall shoulder function significantly more than no treatment over 6 months.

However, both active groups reported significantly less pain during movement compared to the reference group, with the mobilization group showing the most pain reduction.

Key findings

01There was no significant difference in total shoulder function (Constant-Murley score) between home training, home training with joint mobilization, or no treatment at any time point.

02Both home training groups reported significantly less pain during active movement (flexion, abduction, rotation) at 12 weeks and 6 months compared to the no-treatment reference group.

03The group receiving joint mobilization as an add-on to home training reached a clinically important change in function at 12 weeks, unlike the home-training-only group.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The reference group was not randomized but taken from a previous study, which introduces potential bias. Group sizes were uneven (20 vs 30 vs 39) due to the randomization method used. The study excluded patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears and those who had received corticosteroid injections, limiting generalizability to these common SAPS presentations. Compliance with home training was self-reported and high, but the study could not fully control for patients in the reference group engaging in their own exercises. The primary outcome (total C-M score) did not show differences between groups, so the findings on pain and clinical importance rely on secondary or subgroup analyses.

Declared interests

No funding sources or conflicts of interest were reported.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that joint mobilization is superior to home training for overall shoulder function. The primary outcome showed no significant difference between any group, including the no-treatment reference, for total function scores. The benefit of mobilization was seen primarily in pain reduction and reaching a clinical importance threshold earlier, not in superior long-term functional outcomes compared to exercise alone.

Read it on PubMed →