Home language environment in relation to language outcome in Brazilian toddlers who are hard of hearing and controls with typical hearing - a pilot study including reliability analyses of the LENA recording system.
Miriam da Silva Ferreira, Cilmara Cristina Alves da Costa Levy, Ulrika Löfkvist
PMID 36287421WHAT IT FOUND
Home language counts did not differ between Brazilian toddlers with typical hearing and those who are hard of hearing.
The home recording system tracked adult and child speech in Portuguese, but it counted more adult words and fewer child sounds than people did.
Key findings
01The LENA automated counts of adult words and child vocalizations were similar in typical-hearing and hard-of-hearing toddlers.
02LENA's automated estimates of adult words and child vocalizations agreed with human counts at 84% and 66% and correlated strongly with them.
03Hard-of-hearing children were exposed to more noise and less silence than typical-hearing children.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a pilot study with only 14 children analysed, so it cannot establish whether home language exposure differs between children with typical hearing and children who are hard of hearing. One recruited child was excluded because the family did not complete the required recording hours. The sample was very educated: 79% of participating parents had a college degree, so it may not represent families with less formal education. The LENA reliability check was small, based on 7 recordings, and the device overestimated adult words while underestimating child vocalizations. Three hard-of-hearing children were older than 36 months, so DevSnap scores could not be calculated for them, leaving only 4 of 7 hard-of-hearing children for that measure. Pacifier use was noticed during parent follow-up but was not formally measured, so it may relate to some low expressive scores.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that hard-of-hearing toddlers receive the same amount of adult talk as typical-hearing toddlers. The study found no significant group difference, but it analysed only 14 children and the device overestimated adult words and underestimated child vocalizations.