RNQualitativeJournal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community2023

Home environmental change for child injury prevention in Nepal: A qualitative study.

Santosh Bhatta, Julie Mytton, Toity Deave

PMID 34839755

WHAT IT FOUND

In rural Nepal, families often view minor childhood injuries as normal parts of development rather than preventable accidents.

Mothers reported having limited awareness of specific home hazards, while economic constraints made installing safety barriers like grills or fences unaffordable for many households.

Key findings

01Participants generally perceived childhood injury as a normal part of development, with minor injuries often disregarded by caregivers.

02Mothers were identified as having the lowest awareness of injury risks and home safety measures, often learning about hazards only after an incident occurred.

03While participants could suggest low-cost safety modifications, financial constraints and inadequate housing infrastructure prevented most families from implementing these changes.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was conducted in one district of Nepal, so findings may not apply to urban areas or other countries. Only one focus group was held for each participant type, which may have missed additional perspectives or themes. The findings rely on self-reported perceptions and do not measure actual injury rates or the effectiveness of any interventions.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was funded by a PhD scholarship from the University of the West of England, UK.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that providing safety information alone will reduce injuries. The study shows that families were aware of some hazards but could not afford the structural changes needed to mitigate them, so education must be paired with support for feasible, low-cost environmental modifications.

Read it on PubMed →