SLPCohortJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2025

Hearing Threshold Estimation With Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Growth Functions in People With Intellectual Disabilities in an Outreach Setting.

Eleftherios Savvas, Emmanouela Dimitrakopoulou, Harald A Euler and 7 others

PMID 40976998

WHAT IT FOUND

Distortion product otoacoustic emission growth functions (DPOAEgf) are a feasible objective hearing test for adults with mild intellectual disability in community settings.

At the standard 20 dB HL cutoff, the test is highly sensitive but lacks specificity, often overestimating hearing loss. Raising the referral cutoff to 30 dB HL improves accuracy.

Key findings

01DPOAEgf testing was feasible in 90.8% of consenting participants, with dropouts comparable to behavioral audiometry.

02Using the WHO 20 dB HL cutoff for hearing loss, DPOAEgf had 92% sensitivity but only 62% specificity, leading to significant over-referral.

03Raising the threshold to 30 dB HL increased sensitivity to 98% and specificity to 77%, providing a more balanced screening profile.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study sample included only adults with mild intellectual disability or normal-range IQ; results cannot be generalized to those with moderate or severe intellectual disabilities. Testing was conducted in a quiet room within a workshop, not a soundproof booth, which may have affected ambient noise levels and measurement precision. DPOAEgf showed poor specificity at the 20 dB HL cutoff, leading to a high rate of false positives and potential over-referral. The test does not estimate thresholds accurately for hearing losses greater than 50 dB HL. Participants with abnormal tympanograms (middle ear issues) showed significant discrepancies between DPOAEgf and reference thresholds, suggesting DPOAEgf alone is insufficient without middle ear status evaluation.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was part of the larger HEID project, and the equipment (Sentiero device) was provided by PATH MEDICAL GmbH, though the funding source for the broader project is not explicitly detailed in the provided text beyond the general description of the HEID study.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret a DPOAEgf threshold above 20 dB HL as definitive evidence of hearing loss requiring intervention. At this cutoff, the test has only 62% specificity, meaning nearly 40% of people flagged as having hearing loss may actually have normal hearing by behavioral standards. Use a higher cutoff (30 dB HL) for more reliable screening or confirm findings with behavioral audiometry or other objective measures where possible.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →