SLPOtherThe South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings2020

Grammatical number inflection in Arabic-speaking children and young adults with Down syndrome.

Bassil Mashaqba, Haneen Abu Sa'aleek, Anas Huneety and 1 others

PMID 33179943

WHAT IT FOUND

Jordanian Arabic speakers with Down syndrome used singular forms well, but dual forms were weak, especially in the youngest group.

Correct plural responses were 7% in the youngest group, 27% in the school group and 47% in the vocational training group, still lower than singular.

Key findings

01Correct singular use was 74% in the youngest group, 94% in the school group and 82% in the vocational training group.

02The youngest group produced 0% correct dual forms and only 9% acceptable plural responses.

03Correct plural use was 7% in the youngest group, 27% in the school group and 47% in the vocational training group.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study used a non-standard picture naming task because no validated and standardised tool exists for Jordanian Arabic speakers with Down syndrome. All participants came from the Nazik Al Hariri Welfare Centre in Amman and had trisomy 21, no hearing or vision problems and no additional medical or behavioural conditions, so results may not apply to people with Down syndrome who have those conditions. The study compared different people at three ages rather than following the same people over time, so it cannot show how an individual's grammatical number changes with age. There was no typically developing control group in the study, so the percentages describe the Down syndrome groups only. Free speech and conversations were recorded but not analysed statistically, so the results depend on elicited picture naming. Correct forms were identified by the researchers and one language therapist, and pronunciation disagreements were excluded, which may affect scoring.

Declared interests

No funding or conflict of interest declaration is reported in the supplied text. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Scientific Research and Research Ethical Approval Committee of the Hashemite University, and permission was granted by the Department of English Language & Literature.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that language training improves grammatical number from this paper. The study observed performance across age groups and did not deliver or test any therapy.

Read it on PubMed →