SLPOtherCoDAS2022

Frailty syndrome and risks for falling in the elderly community.

Carlos Kazuo Taguchi, Pedro de Lemos Menezes, Amanda Caroline Souza Melo and 5 others

PMID 35946721

WHAT IT FOUND

In 101 older adults, 46 were frail or vulnerable and 85 were at risk of falling on a short walking test.

Frailty scores moved with poorer balance and mobility, but no intervention was tested.

Key findings

0146 (45.5%) older adults were classified as frail and vulnerable, including 23 (22.8%) frail and 22.8% vulnerable.

0285 (84.1%) volunteers were at risk of falling on TUG, and among frail participants the proportion reached 100%.

03Self-reported falls in the last year were 22.7% overall and 28.0% among those with frailty syndrome.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was a convenience sample from hospital waiting rooms and third-age classrooms, so it may not represent all older adults. Most participants were female, and male participation was low, which may have shaped the results. The cross-sectional design cannot show whether frailty led to fall risk or fall risk led to frailty. The study did not analyze dizziness as a confounding factor, and pandemic conditions hampered data collection. People with moderate to severe hearing loss affecting comprehension, neurological or psychiatric conditions limiting tasks, or lower-limb prostheses or orthoses were excluded.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the high fall-risk percentages as proof that frailty causes falls. This was a cross-sectional convenience study that measured both at one time, so it cannot show which came first.

Read it on PubMed →