PTPilotArchives of physiotherapy2021

Feasibility of a blended therapy approach in the treatment of patients with inflammatory myopathies.

Pierrette Baschung Pfister, Ruud H Knols, Rob A de Bie and 1 others

PMID 34039438

WHAT IT FOUND

A blended therapy combining face-to-face physiotherapy with a tablet-based home exercise app was feasible for patients with inflammatory myopathies.

Adherence was high at 84%, and participants reported strong satisfaction. Muscle strength and function outcomes were mixed, with no significant change in most measures.

Key findings

01The blended therapy approach demonstrated high feasibility, with a mean adherence rate of 84% and an attrition rate of 7%.

02Participants reported high acceptance of the technology and satisfaction with the program, particularly valuing the remote monitoring and feedback from the physiotherapist.

03Secondary outcomes showed mixed results: chair stand and arm curl repetitions improved slightly, but isometric peak force and manual muscle testing scores showed no significant change due to ceiling effects.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study lacked a control group, so it is impossible to determine if the app or the face-to-face physiotherapy drove the outcomes or if the changes were due to natural history or placebo effects. The sample size was very small (n=14), limiting the generalizability of the findings. Participants were relatively physically fit at baseline, leading to ceiling effects in strength and function tests which masked potential improvements. The intervention was a single group pre-post design, so causal attribution to the specific components of the blended therapy is not possible. Volunteer bias may have influenced results, as participants interested in technology and exercise may have been more motivated than the general patient population.

Declared interests

The authors declared no competing interests. The study was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Zurich. There is no mention of specific commercial funding for the development of the Dividat Fit app in the provided text, though it is described as a tablet-based exercise application.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the lack of significant change in muscle strength tests as evidence that the exercise program was ineffective. The high ceiling effects in the participants' baseline strength mean these tests were not sensitive enough to detect improvement in this specific, relatively fit group.

Read it on PubMed →