RNPilotThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing2024

Feasibility and Acceptability of Using Wireless Limited Polysomnography to Capture Sleep Before, During, and After Hospitalization for Patients With Planned Cardiothoracic Surgery.

Makayla L Cordoza, Brian J Anderson, Marissa Cevasco and 5 others

PMID 38509035

WHAT IT FOUND

A wireless head-mounted sleep monitor captured high-quality signals before, in the ICU, and after cardiothoracic surgery.

Patients and ICU staff found it acceptable, and staff reported no interference with care.

Key findings

01The wireless limited PSG system produced high-quality signals, with only one signal dropout under 1 second and no interference with medical equipment or adverse events.

02Patients and ICU nursing staff found the monitor acceptable, and nursing staff reported no interference with patient care.

03In the ICU, patients spent more time in lighter sleep stages and less time in stage 3 and REM sleep than at baseline; after discharge, stage proportions generally returned toward baseline.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was a single-center pilot with 15 included patients, so it may not apply to other hospitals, surgery types, or patient groups. It tested feasibility and acceptability, not whether sleep monitoring changes patient outcomes, prevents delirium, or improves recovery. All patients received analgesic medication, and some received sedatives during ICU sleep assessment, which can alter sleep patterns and may have reduced awareness of the monitor. Sleep was assessed for only one overnight period at each timepoint, not daytime or consecutive nights, so total ICU sleep time was not captured. Limited-channel PSG may miss important EEG signals or sleep disorders that full polysomnography could capture. The study did not assess reasons for disturbed sleep, such as environment, medications, or nursing care activities, so sleep findings cannot be interpreted as explaining delirium risk.

Declared interests

The study used a Cerebra Health sleep system. MY owns YRT, a small R&D company that licenses sleep scoring technology to Cerebra Health, and MY is a shareholder and receives royalties from Cerebra Health. BG is an employee of YRT. All other authors declared nothing relevant.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the high signal quality and acceptability as evidence that sleep monitoring improves recovery or prevents postoperative delirium. The study did not test an intervention or link sleep findings to outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →