PTOTSLPCohortArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2020

Feasibility and Acceptability of Telemedicine to Substitute Outpatient Rehabilitation Services in the COVID-19 Emergency in Italy: An Observational Everyday Clinical-Life Study.

Stefano Negrini, Sabrina Donzelli, Alberto Negrini and 3 others

PMID 32800748

WHAT IT FOUND

Telemedicine maintained outpatient services with high satisfaction.

Physiotherapy sessions recovered during the telemedicine phase, but consultation volumes remained lower than pre-pandemic levels. Most patients did not require a subsequent face-to-face visit.

Key findings

01Physiotherapy service volume recovered during the telemedicine phase compared to the initial drop, while consultation volume did not recover.

02Only 0.5% of patients required a follow-up face-to-face consultation after a telemedicine visit.

03Patient satisfaction with telemedicine services averaged 2.8 out of 3 on quality questionnaires.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study is observational with a historical control, so it cannot prove causality or effectiveness of specific clinical outcomes. Selection bias is likely: patients with more severe conditions or those less comfortable with technology may have canceled or avoided telemedicine. The digital divide (lack of internet or devices) may have excluded specific populations. The study period was short (15 working days of telemedicine), so long-term adherence and clinical outcomes are unknown. Satisfaction data had a 38% response rate, which may not represent all patients.

Declared interests

No specific funding sources or conflicts of interest declarations were provided in the text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the recovery in physiotherapy session numbers as evidence that clinical outcomes (such as deformity correction or function) were maintained or improved. The study only measures service volume and satisfaction, not patient health results.

Read it on PubMed →