SLPSurveyJournal of deaf studies and deaf education2022

Family Systems and Emotional Functioning in Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Preschool Children.

Shannon Yuen, Boya Li, Yung-Ting Tsou and 4 others

PMID 35099013

WHAT IT FOUND

Preschool deaf or hard-of-hearing children in spoken-language early intervention were rated lower on positive emotion expression than hearing peers, and their families reported lower cohesion.

Negative expression and emotion recognition did not differ.

Key findings

01DHH preschool children were rated lower than hearing children on positive emotion expression, while negative emotion expression and emotion recognition did not differ.

02Families with a DHH child reported lower family cohesion than families with a hearing child, but family adaptability and parental emotion communication did not differ.

03Family cohesion was related to positive expression only in hearing children, and to less negative expression in both groups; parental emotion communication was related to more negative expression in both groups.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study measured everything at one time, so it cannot show whether family cohesion affects child emotion expression or child emotion expression affects family cohesion. The DHH and hearing groups were not the same age: hearing children were older on average, and the analysis used weighting to adjust for this. All child emotion outcomes were rated by parents. Family adaptability was removed from the main regression model because it overlapped strongly with family cohesion. The DHH sample was narrow: all had hearing parents, attended special classes with only DHH peers, and used spoken language; many had profound loss and intensive early intervention, so results may not apply to families with DHH parents, sign-language users, or children with additional disabilities. Missing data were substantial for some variables, including nonverbal intelligence for 42 participants and socioeconomic information. 246 children were approached and 205 were included, although the excluded sample did not differ from the included sample on key characteristics.

Declared interests

The supplied text lists the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences as funder and labels the study as non-U.S. government research support. It does not include an author conflict-of-interest declaration.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these associations as proof that increasing family cohesion or parental emotion communication will improve a child's emotional functioning. The study is cross-sectional, and more parental emotion communication was linked to more negative emotion expression in both groups, so the direction of any effect is unclear.

Read it on PubMed →